Wednesday, February 28, 2018
Friday, February 02, 2018
For holistic appreciation of the hot issue confronting our beloved profession, please read Ambeth Ocampo ratiocination about the position of the NLP director and hopefully after reading this you could better appreciate the "polite action" taken by PLAI-NBOT and be with us in seeking an early resolution of the issue without burning any bridges or permanent damage to our collegiality as members of the profession.
Fulltext copied from Philippine Daily Inquirer article. Thank you.
To view the reader's comments/sentiments and or updates/corrections posted on this articles, please see the original article at the PDI website or simply click the links provided above.
By: Ambeth R. Ocampo - @inquirerdotnet Philippine Daily Inquirer / 05:28 AM February 02, 2018
Vernon Totanes, a licensed librarian, has asked the Office of the Ombudsman to investigate the appointment of Cesar Gilbert Q. Adriano as director of the National Library of the Philippines (NLP). Totanes called the presidential appointee a “nonlibrarian” and, in the process, burned his bridges with the Philippine Librarians Association Inc. (PLAI) which had issued a polite “statement of concern” that stopped short of seeking a validation or revocation of the appointment.
Totanes also dragged Ateneo de Manila into the fray because he is the director of the university’s Rizal Library. Totanes and the PLAI defended their citing of the Philippine Librarianship Act of 2003 that regulates the practice of librarianship in the country. They brought up Section 26 of Illegal Practice of Librarianship that states:
“A person who does not have a valid Certificate of Registration and Professional Identification Card or a temporary/special permit from the Commission shall not practice or offer to practice librarianship in the Philippines or assume any position, which involve performing the function of a librarian as provided under Section 5 of this Act.”
They also cited Section 31 of Employment of Librarians that states:
“Only qualified and licensed librarians shall be employed as librarians in all government libraries. Local government units shall be given a period of three (3) years from the approval of this Act to comply with this provision.”
Their fear is that the appointment of a “nonlibrarian” as NLP director will be a precedent that may allow nonprofessionals in government libraries. But it is a narrow reading of the law because the NLP director does not perform a professional librarian’s functions. He/she crafts policy and directs the administration and management of the NLP, which is not an ordinary library but a cultural agency responsible for the preservation and dissemination of the history, culture, and heritage of the nation in book form. While a professional license in librarianship is preferred, it should not be an obligatory qualification for NLP director.
The NLP traces its roots to the Museo-Biblioteca de Filipinas of 1887 and was first housed in the Intendencia in Intramuros whose third and most (in)famous director was the eccentric Pedro A. Paterno. A contemporary of Jose Rizal, Paterno was appointed in 1894 and caused to be published the short-lived Boletin del Museo-Biblioteca de Filipinas (Bulletin of the Museum-Library of the Philippines). The Museo-Biblioteca was abolished when the Americans took over from the Spanish as the Philippines’ colonial masters, prompting Paterno to take the Museo-Biblioteca collection to his Quiapo home and merge it with his private library.
In March 1900 an American Circulating Library was established. Its collection was donated to the Philippine Commission, which accepted it on March 15, 1901, the date on which the foundation of the present NLP is reckoned. By 1908 all government libraries had been consolidated, and the American Circulating Library became the Philippine Library in 1909 that later merged with the Division of Archives, Patents, Copyrights and Trademarks and the Law Library of the Philippine Assembly, which called it the Philippine Library and Museum.
In December 1928 the Library and Museum were separated and the National Library was placed under the Philippine Assembly and relocated to the Legislative building (now the National Museum). In 1936, supervision of the National Library was returned to the Department of Public Instruction from the National Assembly, but Manuel Roxas, in 1947, created the Bureau of Public Libraries under the Office of the President, shifting its function from a cultural agency to that of an administrative office.
Of the 23 library directors starting from James Alexander Robertson (1910-1916), only four were librarians. Aside from Robertson—who coproduced the 55-volume compilation of documents on Philippine history known to scholars today as “Blair and Robertson”—there were Filipino directors who were eminent nonlibrarians: Macario Adriatico (1917-1919), Trinidad H. Pardo de Tavera (1923-1925), Jaime C. de Veyra, Fernando Canon (in acting capacity, 1925), Epifanio de los Santos (1925-1928), Teodoro M. Kalaw (1929-1939), Carlos Quirino (1962-1966), and Serafin D. Quiason (1966-1986)—men who distinguished themselves in the realm of history, scholarship, learning and culture.
We need more than a professional librarian as NLP director. We need a distinguished librarian, an administrator, or a scholar to head this cultural agency.
Comments are welcome at email@example.com
Thursday, February 01, 2018
PLAI already made known its official stand in the issued Statement of Concern. That revised statement was the result of a series of consultation to our stakeholders and does not prohibit any members from initiating their own actions.
At the outset, PLAI does not agree with the appointment of a non-librarian in any library whether public or private considering the provision of RA 9246 Section 31. But the issue on the appointment of a non-librarian in the National Library of the Philippines is a question of legality considering the different interpretations and stand of government agencies that can answer best this query.
PLAI then would like to know first the opinion of PRC being the implementor of laws related to professionals and CSC being the office that sets the qualifications in government offices, whether laws have been violated or not and follow the due process, hence the Statement of Concern was crafted and was submitted to PRC and CSC for their opinion on the issue so we will know the next course of action to take.
As to Mr. Totanes' complaint in the Ombudsman, PLAI respects his decision and opinion. It's his right to file a complaint before the Ombudsman.
Mr. Totanes' action complemented the PLAI action to CSC and PRC by adding the Office of the Ombudsman to investigate the matter as the appointment of a non-librarian in a government library is an act or omission constituting a violation of our law (RA 9246) and criminal laws particularly on anti-graft and corrupt practices act which the ombudsman has jurisdiction to investigate.
Please share po sa ating mga colleagues para po aware sila papaano tinitingnan ni PLAI ang isyu. Maraming salamat po.